Sunday, September 21, 2014

4. Is There any Archaeological Evidence of the Conquests of Bashan and Heshbon?




While the beginning of the Exodus was filled with hardship and tribulation for the tribes of Israel, it ends with the Jews kicking butt and taking names. Even before they reach the Promised Land and conquer it, Moses and his people are certainly no strangers to overwhelming military victories. 
                                                                                                            The Conquest of Bashan

We hear of two of these such victories in the Book of Numbers, are they are recounted to us in Deuteronomy. In these battles, Moses and his people wage war against Og, King of Bashan, and Shion, King of Heshbon. After asking to being refused permission to pass their lands in peace, these two kings chose to meet the Israelites in battle and were destroyed utterly, down to the last woman and child (Deuteronomy 2:26-3:4). It seems logical to assume that such a devastating act of warfare would leave some sort of archaeological trace. After all, the Kingdom of Bashan was said to contain sixty cities.
Does such evidence exist, however?
The question is met with an overwhelming chorus of “no”s. There isn’t even a historical trace of some of the smaller cities the Jews encountered, much less evidence of  a battle there. In fact, there isn’t even any real archaeological evidence for the conquest of the land of Canaan, which is certainly a far more important victory. What does this lack of evidence mean for the credibility of these Biblical narratives? Some claim that it “demolishes” the historical integrity of the Bible (1.) Others, however, argue that a lack of evidence does not equate to proof of historical discrepancy (2).
In order to decide what this absence of proof meant for myself, I decided to research similar occurrences outside of Biblical history, where the results of my research were less likely to be biased. All in all, I was surprised by how many major cities humans have managed to misplace over the past few millennia.
For instance, Machu Picchu, a large Incan city built on a mountaintop in Peru, remained undiscovered by modern men until 1911, when a Yale professor came across the ruins during a hike (3). 
                                                              Machu Picchu

One of the ancient world’s oldest and most well-established cities, Mohenjo-daro, was founded nearly five millennia ago, flourished for thousands of years, and was only rediscovered in 1921 in modern-day Pakistan (4). Even the city of Troy, on which Homer centered his narrative about the birth of Western Civilization, was lost for so long that it was speculated to be only a legend. It wasn’t until 1871 that a city was discovered matching the classical description of Troy, and historians today still aren’t sure whether or not the ruins they discovered are indeed the bones of the great lost city (5).
                                                                                           The Ruins of Ancient Troy

In summation, though there is no hard archaeological evidence for the Hebrew people’s conquest of scores of ancient cities, there is still no reason to toss out the validity of Biblical history based on this alone. Especially in a region as broad and harsh as the deserts of the Middle East, it isn’t entirely impossible to lose all trace of such cities.

(5)    http://listverse.com/2011/09/09/top-10-lost-cities/

No comments:

Post a Comment